The other day, Kim Kardashian was crying because of her supposedly exposed skin on the cover of W magazine. Kim was upset because the magazine had promised to cover her body in art but only strips of texts were used to cover some parts of her body. For people who see how Kim dresses and some of her photo shoots, they would wonder why she would be upset. Was the line crossed by W magazine due to a breach in contract?
There have been outrage over some magazines as they are beginning to do less covering and show more skin. But what I'm getting at is that we overlook some nakedness like what Playboy offers. But PETA? This concept of nude photo shoot to emphasize the love of animals is still puzzling to me. If people are okay to pose nude for PETA, then why are they not okay to pose naked for art and fashion? Just saying.
(ukoemem - Author; Ola Y - Editor; Drawing by Fineartamerica.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment